Residential College | false |
Status | 已發表Published |
Patient Health Questionnaire-9 scores do not accurately estimate depression prevalence: individual participant data meta-analysis | |
Levis, Brooke1,2; Benedetti, Andrea2,3,4; Ioannidis, John P.A.5,6,7,8; Sun, Ying1; Negeri, Zelalem1,2; He, Chen1; Wu, Yin1,2,9; Krishnan, Ankur1; Bhandari, Parash Mani1,2; Neupane, Dipika1,2; Imran, Mahrukh1; Rice, Danielle B.1,10; Riehm, Kira E.1,11; Saadat, Nazanin1; Azar, Marleine1,2; Boruff, Jill12; Cuijpers, Pim13; Gilbody, Simon14; Kloda, Lorie A.15; McMillan, Dean11; Patten, Scott B.16,17; Shrier, Ian1,2,18; Ziegelstein, Roy C.19; Alamri, Sultan H.20; Amtmann, Dagmar21; Ayalon, Liat22; Baradaran, Hamid R.23,24; Beraldi, Anna25; Bernstein, Charles N.26,27; Bhana, Arvin28,29; Bombardier, Charles H.21; Carter, Gregory30; Chagas, Marcos H.31; Chibanda, Dixon32; Clover, Kerrie30; Conwell, Yeates33; Diez-Quevedo, Crisanto34,35; Fann, Jesse R.36; Fischer, Felix H.9,37; Gholizadeh, Leila38; Gibson, Lorna J.39; Green, Eric P.40; Greeno, Catherine G.41; Hall, Brian J.42,43![]() ![]() | |
2020-06-01 | |
Source Publication | JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
![]() |
ISSN | 0895-4356 |
Volume | 122Pages:115-128.e1 |
Abstract | Objectives: Depression symptom questionnaires are not for diagnostic classification. Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) scores ≥10 are nonetheless often used to estimate depression prevalence. We compared PHQ-9 ≥10 prevalence to Structured Clinical Interview for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (SCID) major depression prevalence and assessed whether an alternative PHQ-9 cutoff could more accurately estimate prevalence. Study Design and Setting: Individual participant data meta-analysis of datasets comparing PHQ-9 scores to SCID major depression status. Results: A total of 9,242 participants (1,389 SCID major depression cases) from 44 primary studies were included. Pooled PHQ-9 ≥10 prevalence was 24.6% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 20.8%, 28.9%); pooled SCID major depression prevalence was 12.1% (95% CI: 9.6%, 15.2%); and pooled difference was 11.9% (95% CI: 9.3%, 14.6%). The mean study-level PHQ-9 ≥10 to SCID-based prevalence ratio was 2.5 times. PHQ-9 ≥14 and the PHQ-9 diagnostic algorithm provided prevalence closest to SCID major depression prevalence, but study-level prevalence differed from SCID-based prevalence by an average absolute difference of 4.8% for PHQ-9 ≥14 (95% prediction interval: −13.6%, 14.5%) and 5.6% for the PHQ-9 diagnostic algorithm (95% prediction interval: −16.4%, 15.0%). Conclusion: PHQ-9 ≥10 substantially overestimates depression prevalence. There is too much heterogeneity to correct statistically in individual studies. |
Keyword | Depression Prevalence Individual Participant Data Meta-analysis Phq-9 Scid |
DOI | 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.02.002 |
URL | View the original |
Indexed By | SCIE ; SSCI |
Language | 英語English |
WOS Research Area | Health Care Sciences & Services ; Public, Environmental & Occupational Health |
WOS Subject | Health Care Sciences & Services ; Public, Environmental & Occupational Health |
Publisher | ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC, STE 800, 230 PARK AVE, NEW YORK, NY 10169 |
Scopus ID | 2-s2.0-85082494030 |
Fulltext Access | |
Citation statistics | |
Document Type | Journal article |
Collection | Faculty of Social Sciences DEPARTMENT OF PSYCHOLOGY |
Corresponding Author | Thombs, Brett D. |
Affiliation | 1.Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montréal, Canada 2.Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montréal, Canada 3.Respiratory Epidemiology and Clinical Research Unit, McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, Canada 4.Department of Medicine, McGill University, Montréal, Canada 5.Stanford Prevention Research Center, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, United States 6.Department of Health Research and Policy, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, United States 7.Department of Biomedical Data Science, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, United States 8.Department of Statistics, Stanford University School of Humanities and Sciences, Stanford, United States 9.Department of Psychiatry, McGill University, Montréal, Canada 10.Department of Psychology, McGill University, Montréal, Canada 11.Department of Mental Health, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, United States 12.Schulich Library of Physical Sciences, Life Sciences, and Engineering, McGill University, Montréal, Canada 13.Department of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands 14.Hull York Medical School and the Department of Health Sciences, University of York, Heslington, United Kingdom 15.Library, Concordia University, Montréal, Canada 16.Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada 17.Hotchkiss Brain Institute and O'Brien Institute for Public Health, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada 18.Department of Family Medicine, McGill University, Montréal, Canada 19.Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, United States 20.Faculty of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia 21.Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, United States 22.Louis and Gabi Weisfeld School of Social Work, Bar Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel 23.Endocrine Research Center, Institute of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran 24.Ageing Clinical & Experimental Research Team, Institute of Applied Health Sciences, School of Medicine, Medical Sciences and Nutrition, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, United Kingdom 25.Kbo-Lech-Mangfall-Klinik Garmisch-Partenkirchen, Klinik für Psychiatrie, Psychotherapie & Psychosomatik, Lehrkrankenhaus der Technischen Universität München, Munich, Germany 26.University of Manitoba IBD Clinical and Research Centre, Winnipeg, Canada 27.Department of Internal Medicine, Max Rady College of Medicine, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada 28.Centre for Rural Health, School of Nursing and Public Health, College of Health Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa 29.Health Systems Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa 30.Centre for Brain and Mental Health Research, University of Newcastle, Australia 31.Department of Neurosciences and Behavior, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil 32.Department of Community Medicine, University of Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe 33.Department of Psychiatry, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, United States 34.Servei de Psiquiatria, Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain 35.Departament de Psiquiatria i Medicina Legal, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Badalona, Spain 36.Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, United States 37.Department of Psychosomatic Medicine, Center for Internal Medicine and Dermatology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany 38.Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia 39.Tropical Epidemiology Group, Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom 40.Duke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, United States 41.School of Social Work, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, United States 42.Department of Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, Global and Community Mental Health Research Group, University of Macau, Macau Special Administrative Region, China 43.Department of Health, Behavior, and Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, United States 44.Center for American Indian Health, Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, United States 45.Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neurosciences, King's College London Weston Education Centre, London, United Kingdom 46.Department of Neurology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, United States 47.Department of Psychological Medicine, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore 48.Instituto Nacional de Psiquiatría Ramón de la Fuente Muñiz. San Lorenzo Huipulco, Tlalpan, Mexico 49.Programme in Health Services & Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore 50.Department of Psychiatry, Mackay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan 51.Department of Medical Research, Mackay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan 52.Department of Medicine, Mackay Medical College, Taipei, Taiwan 53.Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany 54.Departments of Medicine and Community Health Sciences, Max Rady College of Medicine, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada 55.Baylor College of Medicine, Houston and Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Houston, United States 56.Department of Nursing, St. Joseph's College, Standish, United States 57.Department of Clinical Psychology, Graduate School of Niigata Seiryo University, Niigata, Japan 58.Department of Epidemiology and Psychosocial Research, Instituto Nacional de Psiquiatría Ramón de la Fuente Muñiz, Ciudad de México, Mexico 59.National Institute of Science and Technology, Translational Medicine, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil 60.Centre for Rural Health, School of Nursing and Public Health, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa 61.Centre for Behavioural Sciences and Mental Health, Italian National Institute of Health, Rome, Italy 62.NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center, Philadelphia, United States 63.American College of Radiology, Philadelphia, United States 64.Institute of Cardiovascular & Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom 65.Division of Psychiatry, Royal Edinburgh Hospital, University of Edinburg, Edinburgh, United Kingdom 66.Department of Behavioral Science, University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States 67.Allina Health, Minneapolis, United States 68.Department of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany 69.Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Science, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom 70.School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia 71.Deakin University, IMPACT Strategic Research Centre, School of Medicine, Barwon Health, Geelong, Australia 72.Department of General Practice, Amsterdam Institute for General Practice and Public Health, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location AMC, Netherlands 73.Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Clinical Hospital, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile 74.Millennium Institute for Depression and Personality Research (MIDAP), Ministry of Economy, Macul, Chile 75.Psychiatry Department, Tufts Medical Center, Tufts University, Boston, United States 76.Department of Social Sciences and Health Policy, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, United States 77.Wake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center, Winston-Salem, United States 78.Department of Physiotherapy, School of Primary and Allied Health Care, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia 79.Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery & Palliative Care, King's College London, London, United Kingdom 80.Department of Educational and Counselling Psychology, McGill University, Montréal, Canada 81.Biomedical Ethics Unit, McGill University, Montréal, Canada |
Recommended Citation GB/T 7714 | Levis, Brooke,Benedetti, Andrea,Ioannidis, John P.A.,et al. Patient Health Questionnaire-9 scores do not accurately estimate depression prevalence: individual participant data meta-analysis[J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2020, 122, 115-128.e1. |
APA | Levis, Brooke., Benedetti, Andrea., Ioannidis, John P.A.., Sun, Ying., Negeri, Zelalem., He, Chen., Wu, Yin., Krishnan, Ankur., Bhandari, Parash Mani., Neupane, Dipika., Imran, Mahrukh., Rice, Danielle B.., Riehm, Kira E.., Saadat, Nazanin., Azar, Marleine., Boruff, Jill., Cuijpers, Pim., Gilbody, Simon., Kloda, Lorie A.., ...& Thombs, Brett D. (2020). Patient Health Questionnaire-9 scores do not accurately estimate depression prevalence: individual participant data meta-analysis. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 122, 115-128.e1. |
MLA | Levis, Brooke,et al."Patient Health Questionnaire-9 scores do not accurately estimate depression prevalence: individual participant data meta-analysis".JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY 122(2020):115-128.e1. |
Files in This Item: | There are no files associated with this item. |
Items in the repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
Edit Comment