Residential College | false |
Status | 已發表Published |
Thing-ing and No-Thing in Heidegger, Kant, and Laozi | |
Wang, Qingjie James | |
2016-06 | |
Source Publication | Dao |
ISSN | 1540-3009 |
Volume | 15Issue:2Pages:159-174 |
Abstract | “Thing” and “nothing” are metaphysical themes of thinking for major philosophers both in the West and in East Asia, such as Heidegger, Kant, and Laozi 老子. In light of a discussion of Heidegger’s understanding of thing-ing and no-thing and of his critical interpretation of Kant on the same issue, I shall in this essay reconstruct a Laozian theory of thing and nothing. My conclusion is that thing and nothing are not two “things,” as often assumed by an epistemological approach, but ontologically one thing cut by an absolute limit set up by human rationality which is contained either in our consciousness or in our languages. |
Keyword | Chinese Metaphysics Heidegger Kant Laozi 老子 Thing |
DOI | 10.1007/s11712-016-9485-y |
URL | View the original |
Indexed By | A&HCI |
Language | 英語English |
WOS Research Area | Asian Studies ; Philosophy |
WOS ID | WOS:000376403400001 |
Scopus ID | 2-s2.0-84962741913 |
Fulltext Access | |
Citation statistics | |
Document Type | Journal article |
Collection | University of Macau Faculty of Arts and Humanities DEPARTMENT OF PHILOSOPHY AND RELIGIOUS STUDIES |
Corresponding Author | Wang, Qingjie James |
Affiliation | Department of Philosophy, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong |
Recommended Citation GB/T 7714 | Wang, Qingjie James. Thing-ing and No-Thing in Heidegger, Kant, and Laozi[J]. Dao, 2016, 15(2), 159-174. |
APA | Wang, Qingjie James.(2016). Thing-ing and No-Thing in Heidegger, Kant, and Laozi. Dao, 15(2), 159-174. |
MLA | Wang, Qingjie James."Thing-ing and No-Thing in Heidegger, Kant, and Laozi".Dao 15.2(2016):159-174. |
Files in This Item: | There are no files associated with this item. |
Items in the repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
Edit Comment