Residential College | false |
Status | 已發表Published |
The Resultative constructions in English and Chinese: A functional-cognitive analysis | |
Ronald Fong | |
2019 | |
Source Publication | LINGUISTICS AND THE HUMAN SCIENCES |
ISSN | 1742-2906 |
Volume | 13Issue:3Pages:241-263 |
Abstract | This paper investigates the interaction between verbal and constructional properties of the resultative constructions in English and Chinese. The choice of this structure brings out the important interface between syntax and semantics. The resultative in both English and Chinese is argued to be a construction larger than a single compound, and this is more controversial in Chinese because almost all linguists will treat the resultative such as da si ‘hit die’ as a compound. In particular, the construction is treated as subordination implied by the Deranking Hierarchy (Cristofaro, 2003) and a mini-construction in the sense of Construction Grammar (Goldberg, 1995; Boas, 2004). Simultaneously, the resultative is taken to be a highly transitive structure (Hopper and Thompson, 1980; Cheng and Huang, 1994). Finally, we will argue along Fauconnier’s (1997: 173) observation that ‘grammatical constructions are blends, which are entrenched but evolve diachronically’, which seems to be the case of the resultative construction in Chinese. ; This paper investigates the interaction between verbal and constructional properties of the resultative constructions in English and Chinese. The choice of this structure brings out the important interface between syntax and semantics. The resultative in both English and Chinese is argued to be a construction larger than a single compound, and this is more controversial in Chinese because almost all linguists will treat the resultative such as da si ‘hit die’ as a compound. In particular, the construction is treated as subordination implied by the Deranking Hierarchy (Cristofaro, 2003) and a mini-construction in the sense of Construction Grammar (Goldberg, 1995; Boas, 2004). Simultaneously, the resultative is taken to be a highly transitive structure (Hopper and Thompson, 1980; Cheng and Huang, 1994). Finally, we will argue along Fauconnier’s (1997: 173) observation that ‘grammatical constructions are blends, which are entrenched but evolve diachronically’, which seems to be the case of the resultative construction in Chinese. |
Keyword | Construction Mental Space Resultative Construction Mental Space Resultative |
DOI | 10.1558/lhs.20162 |
Language | 英語English |
WOS Research Area | Linguistics ; Linguistics |
WOS Subject | Language & Linguistics ; Language & Linguistics |
WOS ID | WOS:000477748300003 |
Publisher | EQUINOX PUBLISHING LTD, 415, THE WORKSTATION, 15 PATERNOSTER ROW, SHEFFIELD, S1 2BX, ENGLAND |
Fulltext Access | |
Citation statistics | |
Document Type | Journal article |
Collection | DEPARTMENT OF ENGLISH |
Corresponding Author | Ronald Fong |
Affiliation | University of Macau |
First Author Affilication | University of Macau |
Corresponding Author Affilication | University of Macau |
Recommended Citation GB/T 7714 | Ronald Fong. The Resultative constructions in English and Chinese: A functional-cognitive analysis[J]. LINGUISTICS AND THE HUMAN SCIENCES, 2019, 13(3), 241-263. |
APA | Ronald Fong.(2019). The Resultative constructions in English and Chinese: A functional-cognitive analysis. LINGUISTICS AND THE HUMAN SCIENCES, 13(3), 241-263. |
MLA | Ronald Fong."The Resultative constructions in English and Chinese: A functional-cognitive analysis".LINGUISTICS AND THE HUMAN SCIENCES 13.3(2019):241-263. |
Files in This Item: | There are no files associated with this item. |
Items in the repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
Edit Comment