Residential College | false |
Status | 已發表Published |
WaVPeak: Picking NMR peaks through wavelet-based smoothing and volume-based filtering | |
Liu Z.1; Abbas A.3; Jing B.-Y.2; Gao X.3 | |
2012-04-01 | |
Source Publication | Bioinformatics |
ISSN | 13674803 14602059 |
Volume | 28Issue:7Pages:914-920 |
Abstract | Motivation: Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) has been widely used as a powerful tool to determine the 3D structures of proteins in vivo. However, the post-spectra processing stage of NMR structure determination usually involves a tremendous amount of time and expert knowledge, which includes peak picking, chemical shift assignment and structure calculation steps. Detecting accurate peaks from the NMR spectra is a prerequisite for all following steps, and thus remains a key problem in automatic NMR structure determination. Results: We introduce WaVPeak, a fully automatic peak detection method. WaVPeak first smoothes the given NMR spectrum by wavelets. The peaks are then identified as the local maxima. The false positive peaks are filtered out efficiently by considering the volume of the peaks. WaVPeak has two major advantages over the state-of-the-art peak-picking methods. First, through wavelet-based smoothing, WaVPeak does not eliminate any data point in the spectra. Therefore, WaVPeak is able to detect weak peaks that are embedded in the noise level. NMR spectroscopists need the most help isolating these weak peaks. Second, WaVPeak estimates the volume of the peaks to filter the false positives. This is more reliable than intensity-based filters that are widely used in existing methods. We evaluate the performance of WaVPeak on the benchmark set proposed by PICKY (Alipanahi et al., 2009), one of the most accurate methods in the literature. The dataset comprises 32 2D and 3D spectra from eight different proteins. Experimental results demonstrate that WaVPeak achieves an average of 96%, 91%, 88%, 76% and 85% recall on N-HSQC, HNCO, HNCA, HNCACB and CBCA(CO)NH, respectively. When the same number of peaks are considered, WaVPeak significantly outperforms PICKY. © The Author(s) 2012. Published by Oxford University Press. |
DOI | 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts078 |
URL | View the original |
Indexed By | SCIE |
Language | 英語English |
WOS Research Area | Biochemical Research Methods ; Statistics & Probability ; Mathematical & Computational Biology ; Computer Science, Interdisciplinary Applications ; Biotechnology & Applied Microbiology |
WOS Subject | Biochemical Research Methods ; Biotechnology & Applied Microbiology ; Computer Science, Interdisciplinary Applications ; Mathematical & Computational Biology ; Statistics & Probability |
WOS ID | WOS:000302298900002 |
Scopus ID | 2-s2.0-84859239922 |
Fulltext Access | |
Citation statistics | |
Document Type | Journal article |
Collection | DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICS |
Affiliation | 1.Xiamen University 2.Hong Kong University of Science and Technology 3.King Abdullah University of Science and Technology |
Recommended Citation GB/T 7714 | Liu Z.,Abbas A.,Jing B.-Y.,et al. WaVPeak: Picking NMR peaks through wavelet-based smoothing and volume-based filtering[J]. Bioinformatics, 2012, 28(7), 914-920. |
APA | Liu Z.., Abbas A.., Jing B.-Y.., & Gao X. (2012). WaVPeak: Picking NMR peaks through wavelet-based smoothing and volume-based filtering. Bioinformatics, 28(7), 914-920. |
MLA | Liu Z.,et al."WaVPeak: Picking NMR peaks through wavelet-based smoothing and volume-based filtering".Bioinformatics 28.7(2012):914-920. |
Files in This Item: | There are no files associated with this item. |
Items in the repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
Edit Comment