| Residential College | false |
| Status | 已發表Published |
| 羅馬法與中世紀法加工理論中的亞里士多德本體（ substantia）與本質（ essentia）哲學： 從 Sabinus 與 Proculus 學派，到注釋法學派與評注法學派 | |
| Alternative Title | The Aristotelian Substantialism and Essentialism in the Roman and Medieval Specificatio Law Theory: From the Sabinians and Proculians, to the Glossators and Commentators |
NG KEI KEI
| |
| 2023-12 | |
| Conference Name | "The 5th National Roman Law Youth Forum: Diritto Romano e Diritto Civile Comparato nell'Epoca di Codice Civile Cinese" (「 第五屆全國羅馬法青年論壇： 民法典時代的羅馬法與比較民法研究」研討會) |
| Conference Date | 2023-12-09 |
| Conference Place | Xiangtan University, Hunan (湖南湘潭大學) |
| Abstract | 罗马法原始文献使用了种（species）、质料（materia）、形式（forma）、实质（substantia）等概念来解决以下问题：若使他人的材料形成新的样式或称新种（nova species）、使种（样式）改变（species mutata），物应归何人。学界一直有认为，Sabinus与Proculus学派的相反见解，乃基于不同哲学：前者遵从斯多亚哲学，重质料，后者遵从亚里士多德哲学，重形式。惟此说无确凿证据支持。本文旨在论证，有别于罗马的法学家，中世纪注释法学派（Azo、Odofredus、Accursius）与评注法学派（Bartolus、Baldus）明确点名（Aristoteles、Boethius）援引亚里士多德哲学来诠释罗马法，借用形而上学的种、形式、质料、本体或称实质（substantia）、本质（essentia）、存在（esse）、同一性（identitas）、本体形式或称实质形式（forma substantialis）与偶性形式（forma accidentalis）等概念，在加工问题上适用了哲学命题，诸如“物的形式是物的存在”（forma rei est esse rei）、“形式转变（transformatam），存在终止（esse desinit）”、“种成名（nomen）易”、“定义限定本质”（diffinitio claudit essentiam）。 |
| Other Abstract | In the original Roman Law texts, concepts such as species (species), matter (materia), form (forma) and substance (substantia) are used to answer the following question: if someone makes a new species (nova species) with other’s materials, or makes the species changed (species mutata), who should be the owner of this thing? It has been held that the school of Sabinus and the school of Proculus suggested two opposite solutions based on different philosophical beliefs: the former follows the Stoic Philosophy focusing on the matter, while the latter follows the Aristotelian Philosophy focusing on the form. However, there’s no sufficient and secure evidence for the claim. This paper aims to prove that, the school of Glossators (Azo, Odofredus and Accursius etc.) and the school of Commentators (Bartolus and Baldus etc.) in the Medieval Ages, unlike the Roman jurists, utilized clearly the Aristotelian Philosophy to interpret the Roman Law, mentioning explicitly Aristotle and Boethius and applying philosophical arguments, such as ‘the form of thing is the being of thing’ (forma rei est esse rei), ‘when the form changes (transformatam), the being desists (esse desinit)’, ‘when the species is made, the name (nomen) changes’ and ‘the definition confines the essence (diffinitio claudit essentiam)’ to solve cases of specificatio with metaphysical concepts of species, forma, materia, substantia, esse (being), identitas (identity), forma substantialis (substantial form) and forma accidentalis (accidental form). |
| Keyword | 加工（specificatio）与种（species） 亚里士多德本体（substantia）与本质（essentia）哲学 形式（forma）与质料（materia） 注释法学派与评注法学派 萨宾努斯学派与普罗库鲁斯学派 Specification (Specificatio) And Species (Species) Essence (Essentia) And Substance (Substantia) In Aristotle’s Philosophy Form (Forma) And Matter (Materia) Glossators And Commentators Sabinus And Proculu |
| Indexed By | 其他 |
| Funding Project | Research and Publication Project on Jurisprudence / Macau Positive law / Legal History |
| Language | 中文Chinese |
| Document Type | Conference paper |
| Collection | DEPARTMENT OF MACAO LEGAL STUDIES |
| Affiliation | 1.Department of Macao Legal Studies, Faculty of Law, University of Macau 2.The Institute of Advanced Studies in Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Macau |
| Recommended Citation GB/T 7714 | NG KEI KEI. 羅馬法與中世紀法加工理論中的亞里士多德本體（ substantia）與本質（ essentia）哲學： 從 Sabinus 與 Proculus 學派，到注釋法學派與評注法學派[C], 2023. |
| APA | NG KEI KEI.(2023). 羅馬法與中世紀法加工理論中的亞里士多德本體（ substantia）與本質（ essentia）哲學： 從 Sabinus 與 Proculus 學派，到注釋法學派與評注法學派. . |
| Files in This Item: | There are no files associated with this item. | |||||
Items in the repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
Edit Comment