| Residential College | false |
| Status | 已發表Published |
| 作為與不作為之區分的目的理性思考Purposeful-Rational Thinking of the Distinction Between Action and Omission | |
呂翰嶽Lyu Hanyue
| |
| 2022-12 | |
| Source Publication | 不作為犯研究的新展開New Developments in the Doctrine of Omissive Offence |
| Author of Source | 黎宏Li Hong |
| Publication Place | 北京Beijing |
| Publisher | 北京大學出版社Peking University Press |
| Pages | 3-31 |
| Abstract | 不作為犯在本體結構和規範標準上有其特殊性，而在多義舉止方式及“通過作為的不作為”等場合，作為與不作為的區分成為問題。在德國，不真正不作為犯有其獨特的法定要件和法律後果，區分作為與不作為對我國司法實踐的意義在于，是否通過保證人地位限縮處罰範圍。根據這一目的指引，停止能量投入應被合目的地理解為能量不投入即不作為，其他特定方向上的能量投入皆為作為。該標準適用于真正的多義舉止方式和中斷救助，而“逆形態參與” 、原因自由不作為和作為與不作為的競合都不是真正的行為形態區分問題。 |
| Other Abstract | Because of the ontological and normative particularities of criminal omissions, the distinction between action and omission is a major problem in the cases of ambiguous behaviour and "omission via action". In the German Criminal Code, a number of special conditions and an optional mitigation are provided to criminal omission, whereas in China the practical significance of the distinction is whether a limitation of punishment by means of guarantee is necessary. For this purpose, the input of energy that stops a continuous input of energy is to be understood as non-input of energy, i.e., omission, whereas inputs of energy in other directions are still actions. This rule applies to genuinely ambiguous behaviour and termination of rescue. The problems of "participation through behaviour inverted form", omissio libera in causa, and competition between action and omission do not belong to the distinction between action and omission in the first place and therefore have no influence on the above-mentioned criterion. |
| Subject Area | 刑法学 |
| Language | 中文Chinese |
| ISBN | 9787301336717 |
| Document Type | Book chapter |
| Version | 修訂再版Updated Reprint |
| Collection | DEPARTMENT OF GLOBAL LEGAL STUDIES |
| Affiliation | 澳門大學法學院Faculty of Law, University of Macau |
| Recommended Citation GB/T 7714 | 呂翰嶽Lyu Hanyue. 作為與不作為之區分的目的理性思考Purposeful-Rational Thinking of the Distinction Between Action and Omission[M]. 不作為犯研究的新展開New Developments in the Doctrine of Omissive Offence, 修訂再版Updated Reprint, 北京Beijing:北京大學出版社Peking University Press, 2022, 3-31. |
| APA | 呂翰嶽Lyu Hanyue.(2022). 作為與不作為之區分的目的理性思考Purposeful-Rational Thinking of the Distinction Between Action and Omission. 不作為犯研究的新展開New Developments in the Doctrine of Omissive Offence, 3-31. |
| Files in This Item: | Download All | |||||
| File Name/Size | Publications | Version | Access | License | ||
| 作為與不作為之區分的目的理性思考.pdf（2634KB） | 专著章节 | 开放获取 | CC BY-NC-SA | View Download | ||
Items in the repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
Edit Comment