Residential College | false |
Status | 已發表Published |
Is a complex neural network based air quality prediction model better than a simple one? A Bayesian point of view | |
K. I. Hoi; K. V. Yuen; K. M. Mok | |
2010-05-28 | |
Conference Name | 2nd International Symposium on Computational Mechanics 12th International Conference on the Enhancement and Promotion of Computational Methods in Engineering and Science |
Source Publication | AIP Conference Proceedings |
Volume | 1233 |
Issue | PART 1 |
Pages | 764-769 |
Conference Date | NOV 30-DEC 03, 2009 & DEC 02-03, 2009 |
Conference Place | Hong Kong & Macau, PEOPLES R CHINA |
Publisher | AMER INST PHYSICS, 2 HUNTINGTON QUADRANGLE, STE 1NO1, MELVILLE, NY 11747-4501 USA |
Abstract | In this study the neural network based air quality prediction model was tested in a typical coastal city, Macau, with Latitude 22°10'N and Longitude 113°34'E. By using five years of air quality and meteorological data recorded at an ambient air quality monitoring station between 2001 and 2005, it was found that the performance of the ANN model was generally improved by increasing the number of hidden neurons in the training phase. However, the performance of the ANN model was not sensitive to the change in the number of hidden neurons during the prediction phase. Therefore, the improvement in the error statistics for a complex ANN model in the training phase may be only caused by the overfitting of the data. In addition, the posterior PDF of the parameter vector conditional on the training dataset was investigated for different number of hidden neurons. It was found that the parametric space for a simple ANN model was globally identifiable and the Levenberg-Marquardt backpropagation algorithm was able to locate the optimal parameter vector. However, the parameter vector might contain redundant parameters and the parametric space was not globally identifiable when the model class became complex. In addition, the Levenberg-Marquardt backpropagation algorithm was unable to locate the most optimal parameter vector in this situation. Finally, it was concluded that the a more complex MLP model, that fits the data better, is not necessarily better than a simple one. |
Keyword | Air Quality Prediction Artificial Neural Network Bayesian Approach Macau Pm10 |
DOI | 10.1063/1.3452273 |
URL | View the original |
Indexed By | CPCI-S |
Language | 英語English |
WOS Research Area | Engineering ; Mathematics ; Mechanics |
WOS Subject | Engineering, Civil ; Engineering, Mechanical ; Mathematics, Applied ; Mechanics |
WOS ID | WOS:000283003800131 |
Scopus ID | 2-s2.0-77955745448 |
Fulltext Access | |
Citation statistics | |
Document Type | Conference paper |
Collection | DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING Faculty of Science and Technology |
Affiliation | Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Macau |
First Author Affilication | University of Macau |
Recommended Citation GB/T 7714 | K. I. Hoi,K. V. Yuen,K. M. Mok. Is a complex neural network based air quality prediction model better than a simple one? A Bayesian point of view[C]:AMER INST PHYSICS, 2 HUNTINGTON QUADRANGLE, STE 1NO1, MELVILLE, NY 11747-4501 USA, 2010, 764-769. |
APA | K. I. Hoi., K. V. Yuen., & K. M. Mok (2010). Is a complex neural network based air quality prediction model better than a simple one? A Bayesian point of view. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1233(PART 1), 764-769. |
Files in This Item: | There are no files associated with this item. |
Items in the repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
Edit Comment