新興技術時常為法律領域帶來監管挑戰。最近，人工智能技術給法律帶來了嚴峻的挑戰，主要體現為各種新興技術的破壞性影響，以及被稱為悖論和矛盾修辭或所謂的“本質上自相矛盾的概念”的修辭手法使用頻率的增加。本文試圖為這些複雜的監管挑戰提出行之有效的解決方案。首先，本文概述了由於各種新興技術破壞性影響而形成的若干監管悖論和矛盾。隨後，本文就歐盟《人工智能法案》的相關規定與中國關於人工智能監管規範，例如最近由中國國家互聯網信息辦公室發布的《生成式人工智能服務管理辦法（徵求意見稿）》的差異進行比較研究。最後，本文主張法律需要一種新的方法論以應對挑戰，即以“法律通感”概念為框架，隱喻应该結合多種感官的感觉、人類的綜合認知以及將來在法律中應用更靈活的邏輯。

New technologies periodically pose difficult regulatory challenges in the field of law. Recently, new regulatory challenges have derived from various technologies commonly referred to as artificial intelligence (AI). AI poses severe challenges to the law, which are reflected in both the convergence of different disruptive technologies on the one hand and the rise in the use of rhetorical figures of speech known as paradoxes and oxymora or so-called “essentially oxymoronic concepts” on the other. In trying to propose useful solutions to these complex regulatory challenges, the article first discusses the conceptual challenges posed by several regulatory paradoxes and oxymora formulated to address the disruptive effects of various new technologies. It then discusses the regulatory efforts undertaken by the European Union (EU) to adopt an Artificial Intelligence Act (AIA), which is complemented by a brief overview of similar efforts undertaken by the People’s Republic of China (PRC), such as the Draft Administrative Measures for Generative Artificial Intelligence Services recently released by the Cyberspace Administration of China (CAC). Finally, the article proposes the concept “legal synesthesia” as a new methodological approach for law to tackle these challenges, which metaphorically advocates the need for a greater consideration of the senses and human cognition as well as the application of a more flexible logic in law in the future.