| Status | 已發表Published |
| “Ru-Mo” and “Kong-Mo” in Late Imperial Confucian Controversy | |
| Lee, T. M. | |
| 2020-12-01 | |
| Source Publication | Oriens Extremus
 |
| ISSN | 0030-5197 |
| Pages | 315-340 |
| Abstract | The occurrences of the compound terms “Ru-Mo” 儒墨 (Confucianism and Mohism) and “Kong-Mo” 孔墨 (Kongzi and Mozi) in early (pre-Han and Han dynasty) texts have received considerable attention in the study of the history of Mohism. Historians of Mohism draw on early discourses that employ “Ru-Mo” or “Kong-Mo” to speculate about the status or vicissitude of Mohism in Chinese intellectual history. However, the relevance of “Ru-Mo” and “Kong-Mo” to the study of Confucianism or classicism has long been neglected. This paper is a preliminary attempt to demonstrate the relevance of early “Ru-Mo” and “Kong-Mo” discourses to late Qing debates concerning the nature of Confucianism and classicism: it demonstrates late Qing Confucian scholars employ an early coupling of “Ru” and “Mo” (or Kongzi and Mozi) to support their understanding of or approaches to Confucian classics. |
| Keyword | Kang Youwei Sun Yirang New Text vs. Old Text Controversy Confucianism Mohism |
| Language | 英語English |
| The Source to Article | PB_Publication |
| PUB ID | 50045 |
| Document Type | Journal article |
| Collection | DEPARTMENT OF PHILOSOPHY AND RELIGIOUS STUDIES |
| Recommended Citation GB/T 7714 | Lee, T. M.. “Ru-Mo” and “Kong-Mo” in Late Imperial Confucian Controversy[J]. Oriens Extremus, 2020, 315-340. |
| APA | Lee, T. M..(2020). “Ru-Mo” and “Kong-Mo” in Late Imperial Confucian Controversy. Oriens Extremus, 315-340. |
| MLA | Lee, T. M.."“Ru-Mo” and “Kong-Mo” in Late Imperial Confucian Controversy".Oriens Extremus (2020):315-340. |
| Files in This Item: | There are no files associated with this item. | |||||
Items in the repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
Edit Comment