Residential College | false |
Status | 已發表Published |
Superego Injunction: Why Yes means No | |
De Chavez, J.C. | |
2015-06-01 | |
Source Publication | Golden Line |
ISSN | 2395-1591 |
Pages | 26-29 |
Abstract | Although Lacan has been accused of reworking Freud beyond recognition, this essay claims that when it comes to the Superego he remains thoroughly Freudian. Lacan lays bare the insidious strategy of the Superego: enjoyment loses its pleasurable dimension once it becomes an injunction. The subject is kept from “wrong” action not through demands for abstinence, but through forced enjoyment. This can be debilitating not only for the subject, but for its relation to the Other: enjoyment becomes a burden that has to be displaced to an Other who can accomplish the duty of jouissance for us. |
Keyword | Freud Lacan Psychoanalysis Superego |
URL | View the original |
Language | 英語English |
The Source to Article | PB_Publication |
PUB ID | 46836 |
Document Type | Journal article |
Collection | DEPARTMENT OF ENGLISH |
Corresponding Author | De Chavez, J.C. |
Affiliation | De La Salle University |
Recommended Citation GB/T 7714 | De Chavez, J.C.. Superego Injunction: Why Yes means No[J]. Golden Line, 2015, 26-29. |
APA | De Chavez, J.C..(2015). Superego Injunction: Why Yes means No. Golden Line, 26-29. |
MLA | De Chavez, J.C.."Superego Injunction: Why Yes means No".Golden Line (2015):26-29. |
Files in This Item: | There are no files associated with this item. |
Items in the repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
Edit Comment