UM  > Faculty of Arts and Humanities  > DEPARTMENT OF ENGLISH
Residential Collegefalse
Status已發表Published
Superego Injunction: Why Yes means No
De Chavez, J.C.
2015-06-01
Source PublicationGolden Line
ISSN2395-1591
Pages26-29
Abstract

Although Lacan has been accused of reworking Freud beyond recognition, this essay claims that when it comes to the Superego he remains thoroughly Freudian. Lacan lays bare the insidious strategy of the Superego: enjoyment loses its pleasurable dimension once it becomes an injunction. The subject is kept from “wrong” action not through demands for abstinence, but through forced enjoyment. This can be debilitating not only for the subject, but for its relation to the Other: enjoyment becomes a burden that has to be displaced to an Other who can accomplish the duty of jouissance for us.

KeywordFreud Lacan Psychoanalysis Superego
URLView the original
Language英語English
The Source to ArticlePB_Publication
PUB ID46836
Document TypeJournal article
CollectionDEPARTMENT OF ENGLISH
Corresponding AuthorDe Chavez, J.C.
AffiliationDe La Salle University
Recommended Citation
GB/T 7714
De Chavez, J.C.. Superego Injunction: Why Yes means No[J]. Golden Line, 2015, 26-29.
APA De Chavez, J.C..(2015). Superego Injunction: Why Yes means No. Golden Line, 26-29.
MLA De Chavez, J.C.."Superego Injunction: Why Yes means No".Golden Line (2015):26-29.
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Related Services
Recommend this item
Bookmark
Usage statistics
Export to Endnote
Google Scholar
Similar articles in Google Scholar
[De Chavez, J.C.]'s Articles
Baidu academic
Similar articles in Baidu academic
[De Chavez, J.C.]'s Articles
Bing Scholar
Similar articles in Bing Scholar
[De Chavez, J.C.]'s Articles
Terms of Use
No data!
Social Bookmark/Share
All comments (0)
No comment.
 

Items in the repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.