Residential College | false |
Status | 已發表Published |
SAGE is far more sensitive than EST for detecting low-abundance transcripts | |
Wang, S. M. | |
2004-01-05 | |
Source Publication | BMC Genomics |
ISSN | 1471-2164 |
Pages | 1-4 |
Abstract | Background: Isolation of low-abundance transcripts expressed in a genome remains a serious challenge in transcriptome studies. The sensitivity of the methods used for analysis has a direct impact on the efficiency of the detection. We compared the EST method and the SAGE method to determine which one is more sensitive and to what extent the sensitivity is great for the detection of low-abundance transcripts. Results: Using the same low-abundance transcripts detected by both methods as the targeted sequences, we observed that the SAGE method is 26 times more sensitive than the EST method for the detection of low-abundance transcripts. Conclusions: The SAGE method is more efficient than the EST method in detecting the lowabundance transcripts. |
Keyword | Est Sage Gene Expression |
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2164-5-1 |
Language | 英語English |
The Source to Article | PB_Publication |
Fulltext Access | |
Citation statistics | |
Document Type | Journal article |
Collection | DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH AND MEDICINAL ADMINISTRATION Faculty of Health Sciences |
Corresponding Author | Wang, S. M. |
Recommended Citation GB/T 7714 | Wang, S. M.. SAGE is far more sensitive than EST for detecting low-abundance transcripts[J]. BMC Genomics, 2004, 1-4. |
APA | Wang, S. M..(2004). SAGE is far more sensitive than EST for detecting low-abundance transcripts. BMC Genomics, 1-4. |
MLA | Wang, S. M.."SAGE is far more sensitive than EST for detecting low-abundance transcripts".BMC Genomics (2004):1-4. |
Files in This Item: | There are no files associated with this item. |
Items in the repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
Edit Comment