| Status | 已發表Published |
| 修辞与说服——政治说辞批评分析模式探讨 | |
| Alternative Title | Political Rhetoric and Persuasion: A Critical Analysis Model Explained |
Zhang, X.  ; Zhang, M. F.
| |
| 2018-10-10 | |
| Source Publication | 外国语言与文化
 |
| ISSN | 2096-4366 |
| Pages | 90-101 |
| Abstract | Political discourse has been a key issue in Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA). With a focus on political rhetoric, Jonathan Charteris-Black has developed an interdisciplinary model which combines concepts and theories in the fields of rhetoric, psychology and conceptual metaphor studies so as to figure out how politicians tell political myths, create brands and realize leadership through linguistic devices. By tracking the two major publications by Charteris-Black (2011, 2014), the paper illustrates the structure and methods of this model with 23 examples drawn from political speeches given by both Chinese and English politicians. The research demonstrates the explanatory power of this model. It shows that political rhetoric is not only a choice of style, but more importantly an effective tool of persuasion. Furthermore, the use of different rhetorical devices mirrors certain socio-cultural background and, at the same time can be influenced by audience’s participation and cognition. |
| Keyword | Critical Discourse Analysis political rhetoric persuasion |
| URL | View the original |
| Language | 其他語言Others |
| The Source to Article | PB_Publication |
| PUB ID | 49652 |
| Document Type | Journal article |
| Collection | CHEONG KUN LUN COLLEGE Faculty of Arts and Humanities |
| Corresponding Author | Zhang, M. F. |
| Recommended Citation GB/T 7714 | Zhang, X.,Zhang, M. F.. 修辞与说服——政治说辞批评分析模式探讨[J]. 外国语言与文化, 2018, 90-101. |
| APA | Zhang, X.., & Zhang, M. F. (2018). 修辞与说服——政治说辞批评分析模式探讨. 外国语言与文化, 90-101. |
| MLA | Zhang, X.,et al."修辞与说服——政治说辞批评分析模式探讨".外国语言与文化 (2018):90-101. |
| Files in This Item: | There are no files associated with this item. | |||||
Items in the repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
Edit Comment